Close

Articles Posted in Lemon Law Lawyer

Updated:

Anti-Consumer Bill: New Jersey to Welcome Corrupt Businesses

Amy Handlin and John McKeon are sponsoring an anti-consumer bill that would change the business landscape in New Jersey. A key provision of the new New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act would exempt out of state transactions. This means the following: if someone in New Jersey commits consumer fraud upon a…

Updated:

Car Salesmen and Dealserships to be Protected with Proposed Changes in Consumer Fraud Act

Car Salesmen and Dealerships to be Protected with Proposed Changes in Consumer Fraud Act. Amy Handlin and Jack McKeon have sponsored and introduced ANTI-CONSUMER legislation to reduce consumer rights and protect car dealerships. The changes in the Consumer Fraud Act would exempt or limit liability against businesses that are already…

Updated:

Car Salesmen Protected in Proposed New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act Changes

CHANGES IN THE NEW JERSEY CONSUMER FRAUD ACT TO PROTECT CAR SALESMAN Amy Handlin is the co-sponsor on this bill to protect car salesman John McKeon is the primary Sponsor on this bill to protect car salesmen. There is a bill pending in the Assembly which significantly and permanently change…

Updated:

Car Dealership Fraud and Appearance Packages

Appearance Package, Wheel Well Molding, Door Edge Guards Some dealerships use the sale or attempted sale of door edge guards, wheel well molding or pin striping, commonly known as appearance packages, to increase the costs of the vehicles. Frequently, these pre-delivery services are not included anywhere in the buyer’s order…

Updated:

WAIVER OF CONSUMER FRAUD CLAIMS AND CONSUMER ARBITRATION

WAIVER OF CONSUMER FRAUD CLAIMS AND CONSUMER FRAUD The litigation in this case arises out of the plaintiff’s allegations that the defendant committed fraud and consumer fraud with regard to the performance of a home improvement contract. See Cox v. Sears, 92 N.J. 1 (1994). The defendant now relies upon…

Updated:

Where Can you Sue a Car Dealership?

Under the relevant due process inquiry, the forum state’s exercise of jurisdiction must be reasonable, which is measured by the “minimal contacts” doctrine, a threshold requirement for specific personal jurisdiction. Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235, 251, 78 S.Ct. 1228, 1238, 2 L.Ed.2d 1283, 1296 (1958); International Shoe v. Washington,…

Contact Us